[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: A_Magical_Place.png (34 KB, 331x386)
34 KB
34 KB PNG
Welcome to /k/, 4chan's weapons board. Our board centers around weapons, armor, and other myriad military technology. While guns are the primary topic, threads involving any other sort of weapons, from swords and knives to tanks and jet fighters, come up frequently as well. If you're new, we suggest reading the sticky at http://amagicalplace.wikia.com/wiki/Sticky to get acquainted with the board's subject matter.

Before posting a thread, please check our catalog to ensure that a thread about the same topic does not already exist.

>>>/k/catalog

File: its that time again.jpg (3.06 MB, 3024x2530)
3.06 MB
3.06 MB JPG
/k/ is a board devoted to weapons and military equipment.

Discussions about politics or current events belong on /pol/.

>>>/pol/
>>
Do not post threads about gun control. They belong on /pol/.

Troll threads will be deleted, and those posting troll posts will be banned.

File: 1688030254199455.png (385 KB, 656x620)
385 KB
385 KB PNG
https://nitter.poast.org/Jonpy99/status/1784519287291384213
Some pretty decent analysis from today on the state of Russia's AFV/IFV stocks at major storage bases with emphasis on BMPs.

tl;dr shit's fucked
>Overall, BMPs decreased in these bases from 4191 before the war 2793 in recent months, of which two thirds, 1814, look to be cannibalized or in dire needs of repairs before being put in active service. Most of the working hulls are also BMP-1s.
>BMP-2s keep descending into extinction as well as other kinda modern armor such as BTR-80s, and BMP-3s, BTR-82s and the like are nowhere to be seen in storage anymore.
28 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1712380662755501m.jpg (57 KB, 856x1024)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
They're going to do massive bmp spam just as soon as fresh shells arrive aren't they?
>>
>>61512231
the implication that russia can just attack another country if they win in ukraine has been so funny for me because they basically wasted over half of the soviet legacy just fighting ukraine, what the fuck are they gonna use for everyone else?
>>
Zisters, not like this.....
>>
>>61512237
Since the weapon shipments resumed it is actually much worse that Russia has less and less heavy armor to carry their troops. Both the Tungsten Rain missiles and the cluster munitions will completely annihilate all the soft-skinned vehicles they're bringing out to replace the BMPs and do so enmasse.
>>
>>61512203
>While Russia is totally capable to turn those hulls into working vehicles it will take much time and effort.
Russia only has BMP-3 factory working. turning BMP-2 and BMP-1 hulls into working machine will require opening another factory

File: winnie vietnam.jpg (120 KB, 838x1024)
120 KB
120 KB JPG
What's something that war movies consistently get wrong?
193 replies and 32 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: not crazy.jpg (3.22 MB, 2877x1918)
3.22 MB
3.22 MB JPG
>>61506412
>let me tell you about your mental health
>>
File: balaclava.jpg (8 KB, 240x240)
8 KB
8 KB JPG
>>61493826
>mfw me and Lt are making out for stress relief and I feel tongue (thereby making it gay)
>>
>>61493826
oh shit I made that - justwarthings.tumblr.com
>>
>>61496609
the biggest part of PTSD I have seen that people don't get is the habits and reactions it causes. Those habits and reactions cause frictions and problems in your relationships and work and then you are unemployed and alone and that is why you off yourself.
>>
File: 1652719715121.jpg (158 KB, 1762x1225)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>>61499602
Machine guns meant you had to dig in or die, artillery meant you couldn't dig in or die.

AK General /akg/
Like New In Box Edition
>Thread #2021

Old thread here >>61447841
286 replies and 81 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>61495019
You think that's bad, I ordered a Zenitco handguard and Strela flash hider for one on the first day of the war. They were announced that long ago
>>
>>61499438
>>
How am I gonna get a triangle folder for my KP9 now?
>>
>>61511923
Find one on the secondary market or at one of the commercial Bulgarian 5.5mm stocks.
>>
>>61510884
See Rob Ski’s video in >>61510599 post. The AK is more intuitive with simpler controls. The AR has more buttons and knobs that are just added complexity. If you handed an AK and an AR to a total newbie, it would be easier for him to figure out the AK.

File: 1714285574604.png (270 KB, 758x715)
270 KB
270 KB PNG
Why haven't we made/declared bigger nukes? The tsar bomb was literally downscaled from 100MT to 50 because the they were scared that the pilot wouldn't be able to make it away on time.
Surely we have dinosaur extinction asteroid tier nukes by now?
18 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: Screenshot nukemap.png (1.09 MB, 1903x922)
1.09 MB
1.09 MB PNG
Because 10MT is more than enough to obliterate Moscow, and bigger nuke means bigger delivery system. So they are not worth the trouble.
>>
Doubling the yield only increases the area destroyed by ~60%. So two 100kt bombs destroy a quarter more than one 200kt bombs.
On the other hand, if you're attacking dispersed point targets (missile silos, power plants, etc) then you're basically going to need one bomb per target regardless of yield, so there multiple smaller warheads have an even greater advantage over one big one.

The really large nukes existed for two reasons. First was pure propaganda, and the usefulness of that was kinda limited since people could just explain how more nukes > bigger nukes. Second was because in the days of intercontinental bombers CEP was measured in zip codes, and so a huge blast radius was useful to make sure you took out whatever city you've been sent to deal with. ICBMs however had much, much better precision and so the huge yields wasn't needed any more once they got into service.
>>
>>61512089
>Because 10MT is more than enough to obliterate Moscow,
>heavy blast damage 69km2
>Moscow area (within Moscow ring road) 870km2
No.
>>
>>61512146
Big nukes kinda made sense in the age of the strategic bomber.
Logistics and tactics of their strike means they do singular strike per flight so makes sense make this strike bigger, and weight or big nukes is less taxing.
IBCM with MIRV completely logistics and tactics.
>>
>>61511048
there is a limit at nuke size, after which it becomes counter productive

File: bst_banner.jpg (269 KB, 959x501)
269 KB
269 KB JPG
Even-More-Dead-Than-Before Edition.
4 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>61510126
Ill trade you my Taurus G3c
>>
>>61510086
I need to go through my gunstuff drawer and offer up here.
>>
>>61511431
ged 2 id
>>
got a complete 16" midlength upper (CH+BCG) with A2 carry handle receiver and FN barrel. perfectly balanced as all things should be.
pics on interest
>>
File: 20240421_205756.jpg (962 KB, 2451x1379)
962 KB
962 KB JPG
WTB brownells green a1 buttstock

File: IMG_2579.jpg (433 KB, 1880x1160)
433 KB
433 KB JPG
If the Su-75 Checkmate program becomes complete before NGAD, how will that affect the balance of power in air warfare?
16 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 1713717656522521.png (238 KB, 896x560)
238 KB
238 KB PNG
>>61511850
So they are just straight-up incapable of developing stealthy fighter jets?
Unleast they tried with the Su-57, this shit isn't even fucking trying.
>>
>>61511850
It will be checkmate, for russia.
Money wasted into a weapon that's just a pale copy of the F35, made by a traitorous country who can't sell it and honestly can't afford producing it.

I'd rather buy Rafale.
>>
>>61512029
>a pale copy of the F35
Mate, look at it (>>61511879), does it look like they even entertained an idea of it being anything but a 4th Gen airframe?
>>
>>61511850
su-75 is a joke and here's why
they can never manufacture and field squadrons of them, and by the time they realistically could, the US would have already moved on to a whole next gen aircraft and be well on their way to the one after that

russia is a paper tiger, same goes for china
>>
>>61512047
Airframe wise Su-75 is better design, it's how F-35 should be.

but this plane ain't gonna happen.

I'm thinking of carrying my Ruger security 9 with the safety on in my utility kilt pocket. I don't have a pocket holster large enough. I could easily get one, but do I really need to? The geometry of the pocket will keep it from rotating. I plan to dedicate one pocket to the gun and put nothing else in there.
It seems to me this is a legitimate way to carry, but I'm wondering if there's a downside I didn't think of.
>Crap gun
It was my first purchase and the only one I have with a manual safety. I already own it and can shoot it.

Also, does the colors of this kilt remind you of anyone? I don't have this model, but I'm thinking of getting it.
19 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>61511688
>going to wear underwear because ticks
Big mistake bro. Ticks like to get in snug places so unders make it more likely you will get one.
I know this because went camping with a couple of bros one time and wore snug unders. Day 2 went off to shit and when I got in position wouldn't you know it? Tick on the end of my dick.
Of course I screamed which my bros took to be a Wendigo so they deployed all of our Wendigo countermeasures so we ended up having to pack up and go home.
>>
>>61511994
/k/≠/x/
>>
>>61507410
I bought one of these ~10 years ago and immediately thought to myself "Why the fuck did I buy this?"
it never got worn, I have it to my buddy who also never wore it, and it probably got donated to goodwill.
>>
>>61507410
that skirt goes kind of nuts. if we lived in a period where kilts were still acceptable for men to wear, i'd want to rock it.
>>
File: FbBTNLcWQAASKPj.jpg (95 KB, 1378x1080)
95 KB
95 KB JPG
>>61507410
hey hi
thank you for asking
i've been pocket carrying a springfield hellcat with a manual safety without a holster every business day for the last 3+ years in cheap office slacks and my experience doing so has been so positive that i've been meaning to write a thread or two to inform others about how great it is
this thread is a good chance to put my thoughts together so feel free to ask questions
tldr: the only hazard of pocket carrying is that cosmetically-ugly-but-anecdotally (t. my experiences)-harmless lint gets on your gun and any optics that are attached (not sure if that matters for you)
just make sure that the material that your carry pocket is made out of is soft enough to not somehow disengage the manual safety and pull the trigger on your carry gun catastrophically (somehow) and you'll arguably be safer than if you were appendix carrying

Post 'em
120 replies and 68 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>61508109
by farm tool I was referring to the waifu
>>
>>61509236
There’s literally no such thing as a skinny girl with n cups. There’s not a single picture of a slim, petite girl with n cups. On the entire fucking internet.
>>
File: goperpocalypso.jpg (142 KB, 1022x437)
142 KB
142 KB JPG
>>61489798
>>
File: Soul Brotha Too Beaucoup.jpg (1012 KB, 2044x874)
1012 KB
1012 KB JPG
>>
>>61508476
>borderline anorexic
>>61504237
>NN cups
either complete fantasy, or dyslexically converting B to NN somefuckinghow

File: IMG_9517.jpg (723 KB, 1290x1675)
723 KB
723 KB JPG
Why do ATACMS create so much seethe?

Also. What will Russia do now that Ukraine has hundreds of them and they can cover pretty much all the invaded regions?

What’s the long term strategy here?
264 replies and 50 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>61511076
>>61511082
Doesn't riding on the outside of an armored vehicle entirely defeat the purpose?
>>
>>61512090
>sit inside pressure cooker as it detonates from mine/AT/a wet fart
vs
>sit outside of said pressure cooker under the same conditions
Its honestly not a win-win scenario
>>
>>61512102
I see your point.
>>
File: 1687282403062.jpg (14 KB, 303x335)
14 KB
14 KB JPG
monke
>>
>>61512080
everything about that fucking game turned out to be closer to reality than we could have imagined

File: IMG_1507.jpg (578 KB, 1170x882)
578 KB
578 KB JPG
Is it feasible /k/? Also space warfare.
148 replies and 19 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
>>61502307
depending on the time of lunar day thats right. i dont know guns - how much heat is created in the structure of the rifle from each shot? perhaps they designed the thing with a certain limit of how many shots can be fired until it needs a break to cool down?
>>
>>61497426
Recoil and overheating would be retarded. With lowered to no gravity recoil would not only make the gun fly over the place it would move you much more. Without particle to interact with the very hot barrel to interact with it takes longer to cool. Retarded idea to fix these problems: delayed rocket cartridges that Brun most of their propellant outside the barrel of the gun.
>>
>>61504556
this. season 4 was pretty much worthless. just a long boring union story. surprised they even got funding for season 5
>>
>>61510609
>If we ever start parking asteroids in orbit for mining that some company CEO is going to have the mother of all weapons of mass destruction
Already true for commercially run nuke plants and all sorts of heavy industry.
Look at the Baltimore bridge and at Evergreen in the Suez, the ability of corporations to cause disasters with huge impacts goes well beyond weaponized mining operations.

It'll be mostly fine for a few reasons, the CEOs need somewhere to spend their money, if they try to become emperor of earth then they either win or die and they're not going to win because it takes more than a gun to someone's head to make you king. If you put a gun to Biden's head right now, you don't become POTUS, you just get arrested.
Same for any CEO getting uppity. The fun doesn't start until two things are true:
* they can live in permanent off-world settlements such as lagrange stations that would be reasonably easy to isolate and defend
* they are largely self-sufficient in those settlements

Otherwise, we just cut off your internet, fuel and food deliveries and say no. Eventually you want to rejoin the human race because your lolis are getting too old and you find there's an arrest team waiting for you.

If Musk had a self-sustaining colony on Mars that he ruled over, his negotiations about income and taxes on his Earth-orbit operations could get a whole lot more rambunctious. Not even getting to the level of threatening genocide, just threatening to turn the lights off because he owns the orbital solar array that powers North America and feels like pulling a Shkreli.
In theory, nationalising assets that are used this way is the answer but the US is allergic to it. It's still the right answer though, any commercial practice that can be weaponised requires regulation and oversight and can be nationalised if abused. Just like having a firearm confiscated because it was brandished in public.
>>
>>61501889
The old military reports came to the conclusion that conventional firearms would be clunky and awkward to handle and aim while wearing a space suit.

Moving parts were also a problem since they could freeze and or cold weld themselves together in the vacuum of space.
That same vacuum would also cause any liquid lubricant to instantly boil off the guns, and since there's no wind or water erosion on the moon, moon dust is incredibly sharp and jagged, so it'll eat through most materials quite rapidly and jam the absolute fuck out of guns with moving parts.

Hence the disposable boom sticks.

File: hqdefault.jpg (21 KB, 480x360)
21 KB
21 KB JPG
what's this maneuver called?
42 replies and 11 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: .jpg (594 KB, 2592x1944)
594 KB
594 KB JPG
>>61507847
>Anyway they can ship the engine separately and install it on the carrier.
or you know, do that on land and then just fly the aircraft to the carrier. more practical.
>>
>>61510246
>why don't they just truck the plane to the carrier
retard
>>
File: 1708835272532071.jpg (188 KB, 1061x743)
188 KB
188 KB JPG
>>61505974
As usual, americans are training to steal russian tech. theyre probably eyeing to steal that su57
>>
File: cia bane.jpg (36 KB, 509x423)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>61507501
4U
>>
>>61512033
Every time I hear about that story and see that pic my brain immediately plays the Immigrant Song

File: gunsofamazon.jpg (151 KB, 1632x1224)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
Today we're going on a field trip to see some of the shining examples of our militia's cutting-edge armory. From clueless boomers to ghetto drive-by fodder, it's time to see what the low speed high drag operators are doing.

Step 1: Go to Amazon, search some generic shit like "tactical light" or "sniper scope"
Step 2: look at the reviews of the cheapest, most mall ninja shit you see
Step 3: go to the picture gallery in the reviews
Step 4: post your findings and search query here

For example: "tactical lazer"
92 replies and 43 images omitted. Click here to view.
>>
File: 81Fq7YjyL+L.jpg (262 KB, 1632x1224)
262 KB
262 KB JPG
>>
File: 71eh0R4BWFL.jpg (162 KB, 972x2055)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
>>61512138
>>
File: 71MUOdEbXAL.jpg (195 KB, 1885x1060)
195 KB
195 KB JPG
>>61512143
Another game, under 21, black, or senile old man?
>>
File: 616LGTGXcuL.jpg (107 KB, 1996x1001)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
>>61512151
And before you ask, no I have no idea nor want to think about how heavy this shit is
>>
>>61512105
I honestly kinda struggle with how something like that happens. Like, how are they holding it while shooting it that they don't notice naturally?

File: IMG_1707.jpg (2.34 MB, 1965x1965)
2.34 MB
2.34 MB JPG
Do they make good guns? Or are there better cheap options for AK's?


[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.