Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Used my art lens for the first time in a long time. Didnt have much time to compose these photos but I had fun taking them![EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1365
>>4308518It's a man. Look at the tiny malformed cone titties
>>4308441>Look at leica sample photos for the polar opposite.Provide RAWs comparing the two.I'm willing to bet that you're just some dumb post-process nigger who is seething at someone using different presets or something. Snake oil, it sounds like.Tell me.Exactly how much resolution do you believe a 24MP bayer sensor delivers?How detrimental do you think an OLPF (AA filter) is to image quality?Do you believe digital is or can ever be "too sharp"?
>>4309997>Exactly how much resolution do you believe a 24MP bayer sensor delivers?Less than vision3 in 35mm.>How detrimental do you think an OLPF (AA filter) is to image quality?Very. Pixel level sharpness actually matters unless you're a boomer viewing from the back row. Later generations eschewed the reading glasses for 24/7 corrected vision, that's why we "pixel peep" and want retina displays now.>Do you believe digital is or can ever be "too sharp"?Digital is not sharp enough. 4x5 = 400mp, foveon.
>>4309006>>4308997>>4308972>>4308955>>4308951>>4308587>>4308493>>4308492>>4308488>>4308401>>4308398>>4308397>>4308394>>4308392>>4308391Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4308434>washed out shadows, muted highlights.You mean it has good dynamic range?
Pre-summer 2024 editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4294741Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4309627Arri and Panavision listen to the high end cinematographers who use their cameras and lenses.Deakins got the prototype Mini LF's for 1917, Arri and especially Panavision (and particularly Dan Sasaki of Panavision) detune and tune their lenses based on the wants and needs of cinematographers.
>>4309807You can blow up the Alexa 3.2K to 4K and it holds up & looks great on a movie screen. Resolution is one of the biggest midwit things in cinematography. I blame RED.
>>4309864>and it holds up & looks great on a movie screenThat's because 1080 looks good on a movie screen. That one of the supposedly best cinema cameras on the market (and still stupidly expensive) can't even do native 4k is kind of pathetic.>Resolution is one of the biggest midwit things in cinematographyGoing from working in 1080p to 4k was such a ridiculous leap in quality that I can't take this opinion seriously. Additional resolution gives you so much extra breathing room and produces a much sharper picture.If my computer could edit it properly, I would be all in on 8k if not 12k, even though I'd still only deliver in 4k.
>>4309867I think arri cares more about a high dynamic range and not as much about resolution or k because images can be upscaled in post but you can’t add more dynamic range in post.
>>4309870>because images can be upscaled in post but you can’t add more dynamic range in postThis is honestly one of the stupidest things I've read recently. How do you think upscaling works? Do you think camera sensors just secretly have all this extra resolution stored in the video file that you can extract with a good program?
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-6700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)43 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:03 21:54:30Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/5.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating320Lens Aperturef/5.0Brightness8.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length29.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Tried some rolling shots yesterday, pretty satisfied with the result[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RPCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:03 22:33:10Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/3.5Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/3.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length16.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4310000I've been wanting to do rollers so bad but need someone who wants to do a shoot with me in the first place and then someone else to do the driving lol. This shot is gorgeous, didn't know there were any 2 door W123s either.
>>4310000Very nice. Great light and blurr effect.Just recently also photographed a standing car, but more because of the reflections the sourrounding that.Composition is rather bad. The owner, an ex-yugoslavian bear of a man came over to me and asked me wtf I was doing. We chatted a bit and I was able to clarify, but he obviously wasn't too fond of me taking pics of his car[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G5 X Mark IILens Size8.80 - 44.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:05:02 16:17:41Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityLens Aperturef/6.4Exposure Bias-0.7 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length8.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeAv-PriorityFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessUnknownSaturationHighContrastUnknownShooting ModeManualImage SizeLargeFocus ModeOne-ShotDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation2Sensor ISO Speed172Color Matrix34
>>4310004Thanks. It was super fun to shoot it, as usual with rolles. It takes some preparations, and you need a good driver, someone who's not afraid to be in the wrong lane (unless you shoot on a highway) and close to the other car, sometimes even a bit too close due to wide lens you want to use. But if you nail everything, the effect will be stunning.>>4310016Thanks. I like your photo too, The composition could be a little better, but that's perfectly understandable in an urban setting- so many aspects you don't have control of. The only thing I believe you could do better is using a polarizing filter. These glares from other cars are a bitch, plus a polarizing filter allows you to capture more nuanced details of the car, such as paint texture.Posting another, this one is a bit controversial- I consider it the poorest shot I took yesterday. I had to resort to super over-the-top dramatic editing, because I'm a retard and forgot to switch to manual after shooting these rollers. Switched to 50mm, didn't modify camera settings.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RPCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:05:04 13:28:29Exposure Time1/40 secF-Numberf/3.2Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/3.2Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>pic relatedGot it in 2004 for my birthday. Dad spent $400 on this sucker plus the 256-512MB memory cards. It was awesome with the 4x optical zoom and fit in the back seat compartment of my motorcycle so I took it everywhere and got some great pictures. Sensor died not even three years later so my only complaint. I’ll have to grab a few shots from my computer later, but looking back at some of the pics I’m still impressed with the quality of this little guy. They sometimes have that “DSLR” look instead of the processed iPhone camera look.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1068Image Height801Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4305294I never actually properly owned a camera, but for some time I had this lying around in my drawer, it was my sister's. I never actually used it though.
>>4310005Here's a random photo from it.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon IXY DIGITAL 810 ISMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaLens Size5.80 - 23.20 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.00Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2010:11:07 15:21:19Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/2.8Lens Aperturef/2.8Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo Flash, AutoFocal Length5.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2048Image Height1536RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeEvaluativeISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessNormalSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeFull AutoImage SizeUnknownFocus ModeSingleDrive ModeSingleFlash ModeRed-Eye Reduction (Auto)Compression SettingSuperfineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance65.530 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed160Image Number102-2962
Mustek VDC-100, mid 90s.
pretty sure it was this bad boy, Nikon Coolpix 2500 with a whooping 1.9 megapixels
This cheapo Nytech cam from Aldi (I think) somewhere in 2003.
Old thread>>4209257
>>4280143whys this picture moving toward me ?
>>4303869seems like this comet likes to hide behind trees[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:12 22:07:56White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time20 secF-Numberf/0.0Lens Aperturef/infExposure Bias0 EVFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandard
should i buy the A7S2 ? is it easy to solve the star eater problem ?
>>4306728Depends on your use caseThe star eater problem is present in the A7SII under certain circumstances / firmware.Personally I would suggest the A7III, that's what I used for astro back when I owned it, if you're lucky you can find them for $1k flat. I sold mine to a dude for that price since his camera broke, you can find good deals still.Example image I took with the A7III.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M3Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 9.3 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2021:06:06 11:44:08Exposure Time20 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating1600Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness-12.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length24.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Cheap strain-wave from aliexpress? Anyone have experience with these?https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256806382298431.html?channel=twinner
I don't understand. I've been taking photos and videos for over 10 years yet they still suck. I don't know why that is. I get told by family and friends my images are good, but every time I post it on the net there's someone there that says it's awful.Do you all know?(Side note to mods. The pepefrog image is related to photography. It shows him using a camera).
>>4309912I genuinely want to know what camera this was taken with and what software processed it.How did the image quality and up this bad? Did you demoisaic it by hand?
>>4310001It looks like a photo of a photo that was printed on canvas
>>4309905>https://imgur.com/user/Zack194/postsJudging from quick peek at thumbnails my (hobbyist) suggestion is you need to think about your compositions. A good photo usually has subject in relation of its surroundings and frame. Finding which kind of approach in composition would be the best one for the scene at hand of the most difficult parts of taking a photo at least for me. Center the subject in frame and snap is not valid practice for that.
>>4309905>but every time I post it on the net there's someone there that says it's awful.welcome to the internet
>>4309972I'm happy I opened and read this thread after all, I was just expecting boring snapshots but some of it is a level of suck I wasn't expecting. I saw flowers and geese and I like flowers and I liked the honey and the vases but your description of the double-jpeg-disaster bird has me giggling like a retard.
Seems we don't got one right now, so I will start.Pic related - it's from my LX100. I've heard that she is kinda prone to sensor dust, but is this actually sensor dust? Or an error on the Sensor?There used to be two dots but I was able to eliminate one with the "vacuum cleaner trick" - cut out the bottom of a 0,5l bottle and put it over the extended lense. Then suck away.Worked already two times for me, but not with this fucker.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDMC-LX100Camera SoftwareVer.1.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution180 dpiVertical Resolution180 dpiImage Created2024:04:22 21:32:35Exposure Time1.6 secF-Numberf/16.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Exposure Bias1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length34.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4000Image Height2674RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpSaturationHighSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerMode 1Macro ModeNormalShooting ModeAperture PriorityAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EVColor EffectOffContrastLowNoise ReductionUnknown
>>4309314So you're mad that cameras that are a bit more expensive than you can comfortably afford have features you don't need. That's rather silly.>>4309369And here we see a prime example of the "no true scotsman" fallacy in the wild.
I managed to get an interview to be a photographer for a theme park. Anyone have any tips for the interview? It'll mostly be walking around and taking pictures of guests if they ask for photos. I have street photography experience, but nothing professional. Would that be good enough for them?
>>4309890Print out 30 photos on a cheap canon printer and just hand one to the interviewer in 15 second intervals without saying a word. They'll understand that you're a no nonsense kinda guy an you'll probably get the job on the spot.
>>4309554Use parchment paper
should I change my setup from my x-t3 to a gx85 or gx9?Would I recognize a difference in quality in any regard like sharpness, build quality, ...a decent lense assumed?I find the fuji system a bit too bulky...Will there be a great difference in dynamic range?
What kind of camera do I need if I want to do sharp city photography. Does a FF sensor body not cut it anymore ? Or do I just some ultrasharp lens?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerAJImage-Specific Properties:
>>4309775It actually changes what is in the frame according to natures laws instead of stretching and cropping the image to produce an unnatural, overcooked looking clusterfuck according to ken rockwell's eyesI've seen software perspective correction and it always looks like uncanny shit unless it's a 1000x600 postage stamp, then it just looks uncannyYou develop an eye for it after using highly distorted mirrorless lenses because they essentially do the same thing. Too much distortion correction might not affect the MTF chart but you can tell some things are being stretched and squished.
What about a shift lens?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:PhotographerImage searchImage-Specific Properties:
>>4309775You don't lose any resolution by using a tilt-shift lens, while if you use software correction the part of the image that gets enlarged will be at a comparatively low resolution, and the fact that the image is stretched and resampled might cause artifacts.Of course, the cost of a tilt-shift lens is in the diminishing returns realm, but it's an improvement.>>4309782If you don't have the money for a good TS lens it's not worth buying a lens specific for just one thing, better get a newer camera and short prime.
>>4309796A half decent canon/nikon TS lens is a lot cheaper than shooting large format unless you intend to take barely any pictures.Actually it might be cheaper period depending on the LF gear you buy. Some of those view cameras get pricey just for rigidity, standard locks, and good overall condition.
>>4309805>a half decent TS lensYour setup is already half decent, if you're going to invest money in it you might as well wait until you have enough money for a significant upgrade.There also are cheaper and much more versatile options, like getting a better digital camera with a better lens, which you could use to improve any picture you might take and not just architecture with a tripod.>shooting large formatThat's definitely not worth it outside of a very few niches at very high levels and with very high budgets and I wouldn't suggest anyone on /p/ buy one, I meant NEW camera as in camera released in the last few years, a modern one.
Pentax 645n editionPrevious thread>>4307062/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4309959blud tryna sabotage my project>>4309958I.this dude's suggestion >>4309933 for night shots, then I'm thinking shooting the food in B&W. Stupid idea?
>>4309962It would surely be artistic. Food can be quite tricky to shoot in b&w.
>>4309963This gentleman over here is conspiring against my project*
>>4309891>>4309907Hello fellow Columbus bro, do you remember Chicks camera? The one armed guy who used to develop photos there?
What's the best Nikon f camera for working in studios e.g multiple flashes, working with wireless triggers etc
Leicafags are an interesting species.This is a thread to try and comprehend the minds of these consumerist retards.Their subreddit, the premier place for Leica fans, has a rule explicitly stating that any photos need to "demonstrate a skill or technique that is incredibly difficult to execute correctly, has not been seen before, or both"All the photos in the subreddit do not fit this idiotic criteria, yet are lauded.99% of the posts there are about people buying gear instead of photos.They care more about being seen with a Leica than actually using it.
>>4309854is it true, diffusion filter salesmen have been scamming us for what we can get by just setting the camera to f11?
>>4297518>>4297543are you rich from photography or did you start out rich? nice camera either way but i am curious
>>4309977>richm8oeverything you see in that photo is well within the realm of a line of credit, or a single guy with no kids and a unionized blue collar job (tradies can make $70k a year living in a place where a decent existence costs $40k a year). it's ridiculously attainable. 4chan posters have the most distorted perception of wealth on the internet. It's like everyone here is from the third world or eastern europe.Although photography is an "expensive hobby", at the peak it's still cheaper motorcycles, cars, boats, guns, watch collecting, etc and for perspective on financial decisions most perfectly normal people with no achievements to warrant it finance $40k+ commuter crossovers when a $9000 2018 does the same thing, often better, without the heated seats as DLC.
>>4309979>redditors be like>hard day at the construction site, overtime's worth the money>time to order $25,000 in camera gear>yep, everything else i buy this year is going to be a literal funko pop, the budget for figurative ones is all used up>still covering bills and no debt btw>also no kids
>>4309981>regular dingus dad salary >$25,000 in camera gear >covering bills and no debt >no kids sounds like you figured it out
digishit threadhashtag dst thistime version[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix E900Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Maker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:03:15 16:30:45Exposure Time1/220 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/5.7Brightness5.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length28.80 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3230Image Height1615RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeUnknownContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>>4308841Based and kino
>>4309127Thanks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX Optio Z10Camera SoftwareOptio Z10 Ver 1.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.7Focal Length (35mm Equiv)56 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height2448Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:30 18:27:23Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width3264Subject Distance RangeDistant ViewExposure Bias0 EVColor Space InformationsRGBImage Height2448White BalanceAutoRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/1250 secFlashFlashF-Numberf/7.4ISO Speed Rating64Image Width3264SaturationNormalContrastNormalSharpnessNormalFocal Length9.30 mmMetering ModePatternScene Capture TypeLandscapeLight SourceUnknown
>>4309545based flash user.>flash is screaming at the sun with 10000lux
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix E900Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Maker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:04 10:47:46Exposure Time1/400 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/4.4Brightness6.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length7.20 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2113Image Height1056RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeProgram AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
Why is fuji so incapable of making decent eyecups?prev thread >>4286424
>>4309415>>4309416still suck at detail shots of cars.. any tipps?
Anyone have experience with the XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR?Is it too big to walk around with and do street? Do you really need premium glass to resolve the 40MP of the X-T5?
>>4309460It's not too bad. Certainly not a "compact" lens, but about as big as a common kit lens.You don't need the better glass to see benefits on the 40mp sensor, but those benefits are smaller than if you were using better glass. I usually opt for the 35 f1.4 or 35 f2 for walk around / street at that fl, and save it for shots I'm more focused on IQ.
>>4301652I always get card error, so I have to remove and reinsert it again.
Sigma 10-18mm f2.8 or Tamron 11-20mm f2.8?Thinking of swapping out my XF 10-24mm f4 for one of those lenses
Do any of you guys take pics of toys, figures, model trains, dioramas, or anything of that sort? it's something I've been wanting to try my hand at.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D3300Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 12.2.1 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern846Focal Length (35mm Equiv)57 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:11:16 14:47:48Exposure Time1/100 secF-Numberf/4.8Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceCool White FluorescentFlashNo FlashFocal Length38.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
him too[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:04:04 13:29:47Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating640Brightness-1.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
>>4308314thanks bro, i will get it as soon as possible
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeKodakCamera ModelKodak DCS330CCamera SoftwareKODAK PROFESSIONAL DCS Photo Desk 4.3.0.8 WMaximum Lens Aperturef/3.6Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution100 dpiVertical Resolution100 dpiImage Created2004:01:12:10:25:58Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/5.6Brightness5.9 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceDaylightFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1504Image Height2008Exposure Index200
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:05:03 23:38:01Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness1.8 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.8Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)0 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:05:03 23:30:52Exposure Time1/1600 secF-Numberf/0.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness5.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length0.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width6000Image Height4000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
Obviously I still use my MILC, but literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in general. You can even shoot RAW and have 3 native focal lengths to choose from (3 different lenses). If the old magnum photographers could choose between an iphone or their clunky 50s film cameras they would've chosen an iphone 9/10 times.
>>4308318>Discord (normie software, used by normie people)Wow I didnt know mason the sad gamer catboy was normal
>>4308319SkypeSteamFacebergAnythingYou do not need Applel services to send somebody a JPEG
>>4309968Dont forget bluetooth transfer if you wanna do peer 2 peer transfer without bouncing off the internet.Or the old IR transfer protocol, but phones don't come with IR blasters anymore so its actually obsolete now.
>>4309968>Alright I'm just going to need you to install>What?>You need to install steam>WHAT>Ok, install facebook>They're stealing my data!>Skype? telegram?>What the fuck are you talking about just buy an iphone dear god whats wrong with them>we-well you cant customize the homescreen as m->Stupid.>and the camer->Why did you pay $2000 for a fuji
>>4309986*Sends you a direct link to the image on my home server*nothin personell kid
